A young mother, apparently, is serious about the education of his son. But the letter – almost all pedagogical errors, which are only. Let’s talk about them.
. It seems that there is no question: greed is hell is disgusting. Not accidentally the first children’s teaser in the yard: “the Greedy man-beef!”. Probably the first human law and morality begins: share, don’t grab, leave another – think about something else. And the first thing to teach a child to give mom. Let the Pope. Give little brother. Give the boy.
And the first confusion: does not! And the first test of parental ambition: when mom goes out with the boy to walk, and he in front of everyone took away a toy – Oh, how embarrassing! Actually, in my opinion, with many children’s shortcomings, we begin to fight not even because they are so sadden us, but because to save face. And that’s good. Sometimes the troubles begin where it lost all shame before the people.
It seems quite normal: a child will be older and Unlearning from greed. But who knows – some, when they grow up, the latter will give you and others in winter snow is not questioned. Some people whole life even suffer from their greed, though in a hurry to give what they ask, but the torment did not let the greed gnaws the soul.
Of course, we can wean the child Continue reading
If the spouses have common minor children, divorce is in the courts. The exception is if one of the spouses (paragraph 2 of article 19. article 21 of the RF IC):
– recognized by the court as missing;
– recognized by court as legally incapable;
– convicted of the offence to imprisonment for a term exceeding three years.
In the absence of agreement between the spouses, the decision about who after the divorce the child will live, must take the court.
The courts, as a rule, does not itself initiate the decision of the question of who will raise the child after divorce. The non-custodial parent’s right and obligation to participate fully in the upbringing of the child and the parent with whom the child lives has no right to interfere with it (if such communication with parents does not harm the physical and mental health of the child’s moral development) (clause 1, article 66 of the family code). The courts should not wish to change this order. However, spouses are entitled to take its own steps to change the General upbringing of children after divorce.
To resolve questions about who the child will live after Continue reading